Jump to content

Talk:Gold Coast at the 1952 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]

Because it was called Gold Coast at the time. Punkmorten 19:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, on one hand, the lead and infobox state that already, but on the other, there are examples to favour that move (e.g. Burkina Faso → Upper Volta at the 1972 Summer Olympics). What do others think? Parutakupiu talk || contribs 19:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The reason I created this stub under "Ghana" was mostly because of the way the {{flagIOC}} set of templates work — using country codes to identify the nation and create the wikilinks. Country codes weren't used in 1952, so "GHA" is the only one we have to refer to all instances of the nation. In 1972, "VOL" was used for Upper Volta, so I was able to use Template:Country IOC alias VOL for those Games, Template:Country IOC alias BUR for 1988 onwards, and put links in the infoboxes to show that relationship. I was able to do a similar thing for British Honduras (HBR) and Belize (BIZ). But Gold Coast is problematic. So is Guyana, which was British Guiana before 1968, but for which we only have "GUY".
I do not want to "invent" a new country code for Gold Coast, nor do I wish to open up the flagIOC template system to make the country name dynamic (as the flags are), so would it be acceptable for Ghana at the 1952 Summer Olympics to be a redirect to Gold Coast at the 1952 Summer Olympics? Andrwsc 20:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine for me! Go ahead and redirect but then one has to adjust the lead. Parutakupiu talk || contribs 20:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: I now saw it is done ;) Parutakupiu talk || contribs 20:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gold Coast at the 1952 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]