Jump to content

Talk:Gold Dome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

wordizm who represents the [Dome]will not leave factual links and other information on gold dome wiki page. The information listed below has nothing to do with past tenant disputes or any other reason other than it is a fact as anyone can clearly see from the links provided. These links are not to personal websites they are links to official government websites.

As of April 2011, Gold Dome owner Irene Lam has not kept up her payment on the loans secured for her by the city of Oklahoma City through HUD. April 12th 2011 the Oklahoma City council voted to take tax payer funds to pay back the loan to HUD. City Council meeting

Somebody claiming to handle marketing for the Gold Dome says an agreement has been made between Irene Lam and the City Of Oklahoma City to get the loan caught up. Irene nor marketing individual has provided this agreement to the public.

A Facebook page has been created Okc citizen coalition to make the citizens of Oklahoma City aware of the delinquency of the Gold Dome owner.

In addition to defaulting on the loan agreement with the City Of Oklahoma City, Gold Dome has fallen behind on property tax as well to the sum of $43,850.64

[1]

Nobody is disputing what the Gold Dome is.

Wordizm has a completely bias opinion since she works for and is a representative of the Gold Dome. Editing by wordizm should be closely monitored on Gold Dome page.

Okccitizencoalition (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improved referencing needed for this article

[edit]

Most of the references are from 2001. Aren't there more recent reliable sources? Are there sources for who actually owns the building? Can the current financial situation be clarified through the use of sources?

Please explain how to access the City Council source.[2] I could not find the relevant information in the link given. Wasn't this reported in a news article or some other reliable source?

Can the current situation be explained without seeming to blame a specific person in what is surely a complex situation if HUD is involved?

Editors who are associated with the Golden Dome should not edit the article directly without gaining consensus on the talk page first.

Please, lets have some discussion of the facts on the article talk page here, before editing the article by vested editors. Regards, KennethSides (talk) 14:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To access the city council site, click the link and 04/12/2011 in both dates under meeting dates. Click search. Click view located by this title: Tuesday Apr 12, 2011 8:30 AM City Council About one third down the page you will see this title: Resolution authorizing The City of Oklahoma City t - Gold Dome Repayment Funding Resolution V2.doc

There was also an article in The Oklahomam about this issue. http://newsok.com/article/3557829 And an article originally from the Journal Record and written by Brianna Baily http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4182/is_20110411/ai_n57299284/?tag=content;col1

Okccitizencoalition (talk) 08:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The new loan agreement with Oklahoma City and Gold Dome ownership funded through a section 108 Loan funded by a Community Development Block Grant has met all job creation requirements and will be paid by June 31, 2012.[12]...This is old info from 2005. The original loan was supposed to be paid back by June 31, 2012, but was never paid on, so the City paid it off in order to free up more money in loan from the Fed. Gov. for future City projects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.122.68 (talk) 03:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]