Talk:Goldsboro, North Carolina

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Least Livable?

Though it DOES rank 379th of 379 surveyed locales for livability, such ranking does not place it as the least livable city. There are MANY other locales that remained un-surveyed. Yes, it was the least livable of the surveyed cities, but it in no means makes it the least livable in the USA. VexedTechie 17:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not accurate. It rates ALL 379 Metropolitan areas in the United States (some of which include more than 1 city). Therefore, it does rank Goldsboro as the least livable Metropolitan area in the USA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.192.132.130 (talk) 18:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Goldsboro used to be liveable. In the last ten years it has turned into nothing but panhandlers and store froint churches. The police claim they can't do anything about panhandlers becuase they are exercising their "free speech". Amazingly enought other cities such as raleigh and Chapel Hill manage to ban panhandling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.238.205.89 (talk) 06:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

If anyone has any historic or current pictures of the city, please add them. Thanks. --AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 05:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Goldsboro NC flag.png

Image:Goldsboro NC flag.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne Country Day receiving a link in the high schools section

Hello,

In reading through the page on Goldsboro, North Carolina in Wikipedia, the staff and administration of our school noticed that Wayne Country Day is not listed in the high schools section, but rather in the private schools section, which comes later on in the page. While Wayne Country Day IS a private school, it is a high school as well. Could we possibly be listed in the high school section and have a link to our website, just as Goldsboro High School, Rosewood High, and some others do? We would love to spread the news about our school, and we feel that much more people would get information about us if we were listed with the other high schools in the city of Goldsboro. The link to our site is [1]. We would truly appreciate it-thank you!

--72.243.131.131 (talk) 12:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Schools

Charles B. Aycock is listed in the schools, even though it is located in Pikeville, NC. It's true that students living in Goldsboro can go to CBA, it's not actually apart of the city. Also, other schools in Pikeville (Norwayne Middle School, Northeast Elementary) are also in the district for some Goldsboro students. Should they be added, or Aycock removed?--Squirrelontv (talk) 01:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bomb

So there's an unexploded nuke lying around somewhere? Drutt (talk) 23:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went to the farm where the unrecovered bomb rests and took some pictures, but it was pretty boring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.144.92.165 (talk) 05:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Goldsboro, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi thank you Santa for all my present I see you ate my cookies I thought they tasted nasty but you liked so that’s good 2603:6081:3501:FE0:3C1C:1E7F:D4A0:DE38 (talk) 04:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]