Talk:Goody Goody Gum Drops

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 18:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Panamitsu (talk). Self-nominated at 10:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Goody Goody Gum Drops; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

Image eligibility:

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: Article is new enough, easily long enough, and the sources are reliable news sites and a Tip Top press release.

Hook is fine and I've marked as such, but having read the article, I do wonder if a more interesting one could be done. Perhaps around the mathematical modeling to solve the gumdrop distribution problem, or maybe that the flavour has been available in both biscuit and milk form? I also think the article is begging for an icecream shot. If you don't have one to hand, I might be able to commission one from the only GGGD fan in my household (the rest of us are either vegetarian so can't eat gumdrops or think it is an abomination!). DrThneed (talk) 03:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @DrThneed: Great idea, I think that the mathematical model one would be a much more interesting hook! How about ALT1:
"... that despite mathematical models deeming the ice block Goody Goody Gum Drops impossible, it was still created?"
Unfortunately I'm having a bit of difficulty getting the best wording. —Panamitsu (talk) 03:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, much better than ALT0! Just a QPQ needed then. Thanks Panamitsu! DrThneed (talk) 03:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]