Talk:Goujon

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Untitled[edit]

The links to "French word" are unhelpful. --Chris Combs (talk) 19:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is it unhelpful? For you, maybe.

Etymology: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/goujon, from the French word "goujon" so I've found it helpful.

Requested move 9 November 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved using the (automobile) qualifier noted by Shhhnotsoloud. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goujon (disambiguation) → Goujon
Goujon → Goujon (car)

– An 1896-1901 car is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Goujon (food) gets 700-1200 hits a month, whereas the car gets 100-200 hits a month. As neither gets substantial numbers, the dab page should be the primary page in my opinion. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support In ictu oculi (talk) 13:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, if anything the food is primary but a DAB is probably the best choice. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support but Goujon (automobile) may be better (more reflective of the language of the time). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.