This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Antibossicon ... parodied Whittington's pseudonym of "Bossus", claiming that it was rather a reference to the "Bosse of Billingsgate" water tap, built in Billingsgate in London by Whittington's namesake, that Whittington had somehow fallen in love with.
I'd put the commas there either way, since the last clause does not restrict the meaning of 'namesake'. But as the namesake is obscure and seemingly irrelevant, I'd put him in parenthesis. —Tamfang (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is that because you don't appreciate the range of ways of punctuating parenthetical expressions? Dashes, round brackets, and commas [and even square brackets] can all be used for such things. Uncle G (talk) 13:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
