Talk:Great Northern, Piccadilly and Brompton Railway

Redirect

May be a good idea to add redirect to Piccadilly line at top of article, Tom B (talk) 00:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't think a disambiguation link is really necessary as there is a link to Piccadilly line in the lead section and a link in the legacy section for the post 1933 history. --DavidCane (talk) 23:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Depth

How deep were the "deep-level" tubes? 100 feet? 10 meters? The article doesn't say. Hires an editor (talk) 02:35, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Still a good question. Is it in the article now?--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

In the context of London Underground, "deep level line" is a reference to the construction technique, rather to specific depth—the deep-level lines actually run above-ground for most of their lengths, and none are particularly deep by the standards of, say, Moscow. Deep-level lines (also known as tube lines) run in circular tunnels bored underground, as opposed the the cut-and-cover lines (also known as sub-surface lines) which run in rectangular trenches which were then covered over after construction, and as a consequence are only a short distance below the surface. The deepest point on the deep-level tube network is just north of Hampstead station, at 221 feet below ground, and the deepest point below sea level is Westminster at about 100 feet below sea level. See London Underground infrastructure#Sub surface network and deep-level tube lines for more explanation. 92.40.23.135 (talk) 00:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Record holder

Excellent article! Well done! Something that might be worth noting is that for some time, the Piccadilly Line was considered (at least by some) to be the longest railway tunnel in the world. (I remember this from a children's quiz book from the late 1960s, which I might still have somewhere.) TheAMmollusc (talk) 06:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

You might be referring to the tunnel on the Northern line between East Finchley and Morden (via Bank), which is the longest railway tunnel in the UK at 17.3 miles. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_railway_tunnel LowSelfEstidle (talk) 08:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Conversion of distances

As this is a British topic, shouldn't distances be given in mi/km, rather than km/mi? Mjroots (talk) 08:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps; but the whole of the London Underground was resurveyed in the early 1970s, with distances in kilometres from a zero point at Ongar. See also Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#RFC - Clarifying Units of Measure. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

I note your comment there, but as this article deals with the period before the resurveying, I'd say it should be in mi/km and not km/mi. Mjroots (talk) 17:58, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

The reason I wrote the article using kilometres first is because that was the unit used in the sources. This, in turn, is because that is the official unit of measurement used by London Underground. The original bills before parliament usually described the distances in miles and chains.--DavidCane (talk) 21:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Northern, Piccadilly and Brompton Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223194851/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/clive.billson/tubemaps/1908.html to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/clive.billson/tubemaps/1908.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)