Talk:Great Observatories program
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Future observatories
[edit]I removed references to follow-up/future "Great Observatories," as I don't believe they technically are. I'll poke around and find a better place to put them. 24.17.30.163 02:36, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
NASA's follow-up Great Observatories program. * James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) was called the Next Generation Space Telescope (NGST) before being named, and is the replacement for HST. * Space Interferometry Mission (SIM) * Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF) Some future Great Observatories designated probes are involved in the Beyond Einstein program * Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), a gravity-wave observatory consisting of a trio of probes in controlled separation solar orbit, slated for 2013 * Constellation-X, a constellation of X-ray telescopes flying in formation to form an interferometer, at L2, slated for 2016
challenger?
[edit]Just passing by, but this article also mentions that Spitzer was not launched by Shuttle because of Challenger. I believe this should be change to the Columbia accident, which occured in Febuary of 2003, the same year Spitzer was launched. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.136.242.206 (talk • contribs)
- No, since these observatories and their launches are planned years in advance, it was indeed the Challenger incident that affected Spitzer's choice of launch vehicle. --Etacar11 12:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
0.5 nom
[edit]This article was nominated for Wikipedia 0.5, but I failed it because of having no references, rather poor prose, short lead per WP:LEAD and other concerns. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 22:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Grammatical error
[edit]"Parts which survived reentry splashed into the Pacific Ocean." Should read "Parts that survived ..."
See http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/which.htm discussion of restrictive clauses.
DaveCrane (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced and doubtable fact
[edit]In top paragraph: *The four missions was designed to examine a specific region of the electromagnetic spectrum using very different technologies. Dr. Charles Pellerin, NASA's Director, Astrophysics invented and developed the program during 1994.* As Hubble was launched in 1990, it seems not possible that the program was conceived *after* the first launch. A reference and further clarification is needed.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Great Observatories program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071209094039/http://spaceflight1.nasa.gov/gallery/video/shuttle/sts-93/html/fd0.html to http://spaceflight1.nasa.gov/gallery/video/shuttle/sts-93/html/fd0.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- C-Class spaceflight articles
- High-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- C-Class Astronomy articles
- Mid-importance Astronomy articles
- C-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles