Talk:Greek Atomic Energy Commission
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bogus copyright infringement claim
[edit]Can you please say what within
<redacted>
is copyright infringement? The statement that X is responsible for Y? That X is supervised by Z?NuclearEnergy (talk) 14:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. The amount of creativity required for copyright protection is minimal. Presenting the same facts in the same order is sufficient to qualify as a a copyright violation.
- While the facts themselves are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this article should be rewritten from scratch in the temporary space that is now linked from the article's front. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". VernoWhitney (talk) 15:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Greek articles
- Low-importance Greek articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- Stub-Class Environment articles
- Low-importance Environment articles
- Stub-Class energy articles
- Low-importance energy articles
- Stub-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles