This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
Please use your common sense. Battleship Kilkis does not belong to Wikiproject Mississippi. Normally a ship is not related to a country, state or city just because she is named after it, unless there is some additional connection. However, if you really need this ship added, tagging article USS Mississippi (BB-23) is enough. Sv1xv (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, it hasn't been resolved. I just got tired of repeating the obvious. If a project decides something is within its scope, then it can be tagged as such. The ship was named after the state of Mississippi, to honor the state. Just because it was sold to Greece, doesn't make it any less significant to the project. The tag should be on this article and eventually, I will add it back. Project tags aren't the same thing as article content. This article is within the scope of the project, period. -ALLST✰R▼echowuz here @11:48, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to forget that when she was sold, she was renamed Kilkis, after the location of a battle of the Second Balkan War. What connection would it have to the State of Mississippi? Should it be added to a project about the Balkan Wars as well? Please use common sense. Sv1xv (talk) 12:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. There is some connection while in US Navy service to the State of Mississippi: "The ship departed Cuban waters on 1 May (1909) for a cruise up the river with which she shared her name, the mighty Mississippi River. Calling at the major ports of this great inland waterway, she arrived at Natchez, Mississippi on 20 May, and then proceeded five days later to Horn Island where she received a silver service from the state of Mississippi." It is acceptable, although somewhat extreme, to tag USS Mississippi (BB-23). Sv1xv (talk) 13:39, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As can be seen in the images at the USS Mississippi BB-23 article, her figurehead, 100 years later, is still on display on the grounds of the Mississippi State Capital building. Regardless of her name, she is tied to Mississippi, both as USS Mississippi and as Kilkis. Just because she was sold to another country and changed names, doesn't wipe out her connection to Mississippi, and therefore her being in the WikiProject Mississippi scope under any name. It appears I am not the one that is not using common sense. -ALLST✰R▼echowuz here @14:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Someone wanting to improve this article will find, on average, no more help on the WikiProject Mississippi talk page than on, say, the WikiProject Pokemon talk page. Including the WikiProject Mississippi tag is a net negative. --NE215:42, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Greek battleship Kilkis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.jpg)
