Jump to content

Talk:Greenwich (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Cleanup needed[edit]

In addition to the fact that this page isn't aligned with the MOS for DAB pages, I wonder why Greenwich, England gets top billing. Shouldn't locations in the UK be a sub-head of locations in general? I think it would work best as

Geographic Locations

 UK
 US
  by US State (if Needed)

Other Uses

Thoughts? TravellingCari 00:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 February 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 13:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



– No clear primary topic given the large number of other uses, although some like Greenwich, Connecticut derive from the one in London (or indirectly such as the Ohio one being named after the CT one) not all appear to such as Greenwich, Nova Scotia and Greenwich, Ipswich. The area in London has a population of 30,578 and its borough has 287,942 while the CT town has 62,396 though its more of a distinct settlement than the London one. Views[[1]] show that the area of London has 14,103, its borough 3,139 and university 5,437 but the CT town has 13,573 and its high school 4,138 however its common usage for US cities to include the state as noted at WP:USPLACE so this may make the London one far more likely than it but probably not especially given the number of other uses. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.