Talk:Grenville Christian College

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reference[edit]

For those editing this article, there's a new story in the Globe and Mail (here) that may have some useful tidbits to add to the article. Mindmatrix 14:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war?[edit]

Point12345 appears to be persistently deleting all reference to the controversy, which sadly, is what the college is currently most famous for. The paragraph that it is consistently replaced with appears, from its style, to be a news article, but there is no reference to its source. The section on the controversy, and the legal fall out deserves to stay, as it is obvious noteworthy. Judge Nutmeg (talk) 01:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Former administrators of the school have apologised and confirmed the abuse, but these references are consistently removed. Justif2 (talk) 14:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, such references are not being removed. You keep adding info twice, with style problems and breaking a ref tag, and you are also removing other cited information. Gimmetrow 15:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
However, we do not use forums as sources, especially as sources to slam people. See WP:BLP. Gimmetrow 04:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Letters to The Globe and Mail[edit]

Some of the more exculpatory letters are presented without the likely understanding that the School was formally segregated into two classes of student: elite, and 'troubled', if you will. I would expect that the former would, for the most part, have a normal private-school experience, geared toward high academic and social achievement. The latter would likely be represented by the complainants interviewed by W5. I'm not familiar with all the arcana of Wikipedia protocols; but I'm not sure that 'letters to the editor' constitute legitimate sources of information for an Encyclopedia. JohndanR (talk) 21:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:GCC Jun03 A.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:GCC Jun03 A.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grenville Christian College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Link rot[edit]

Many of the citations in this article refer to dead links. A lot have become 404, especially the Globe and Mail references. The article could use some TLC to locate useful references, possibly by use of archive.org. PKT(alk) 18:40, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]