This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
This biography was initially created using material cut and pasted from en:wiki Pig-faced women and wikidata. Victuallers (talk) 16:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support - Steevens is notable in her own right, with an entry in the Dictionary of Irish Biography. It is fitting that she has her own article, with content from Pig-faced women merged into this article. Smirkybec (talk) 13:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose, as the author, assuming you actually mean "split" not "merge". She's notble in her own right, but that doesn't mean she's not also a key part of the PFW mythos. Removing the section about her from the main PFW article just because she has a stand-alone biography—which I think is what you're proposing—would be unhelpfulness-for-the-sake-of-unhelpfulness. Summary style exists to stop articles becoming too long, it doesn't mean removing content from the parent article when a sub-page exists. All this would do would introduce unnecessary bias to the parent article, since the myth in England would be covered in full but in Ireland by a "see also" link. ‑ Iridescent 14:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
