Talk:Grosmont Castle/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 12:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria. I visited this castle as a child and can remember a family game of cricket in what I assume was the ruins of the main hall. A lovely place.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- My only minor comment is that the capitalisation of "Earl" is inconsistent.
- The note on the talk page about the £15 is well made too, this might be flagged up a little more clearly.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation):
b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):
c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 12:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)