Talk:Group cognition
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ref improve
[edit]I've just done some slimming down and re-organisation on this article. There are some bits which were (perhaps still are?) of less relevance to general readers of the encyclopaedia. Having said that, I don't think the NPOV notice should remain, but I've added a ref improve template and that should probably be addressed prior to removing both tags. I hope I'll be able to do some of that but it's likely to be over the next few weeks rather than today. Sjgknight (talk) 11:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
major broadening of scope and addition of refs
[edit]I have undertaken a major revision:
- spelling out different forms of group cognition (others are invited to refine this list and change the names of the forms)
- creating spaces for others to add info related to the "other" forms -- esp. other than what I called "small-group cognition"
- referencing the major historical sources
- referencing the sources in my writings and those of my research colleagues
- others are welcome to add references for the "other" forms and external links or see-also links for the "other" forms.
- I removed the warning templates. I think the article now meets Wikipedia standards -- and will even more as other people add to it.