Talk:Guam at the 2016 Summer Olympics

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Guam at the 2016 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615135327/http://www.fina.org/H2O/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=805 to http://www.fina.org/H2O/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=805
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150221025939/http://www.fina.org/H2O/docs/events/rio2016/2014-07%20-%20Rio%202016%20-%20Qualification%20System%20-%20FINAL%20-%20Swimming%20-%20EN.pdf to http://www.fina.org/H2O/docs/events/rio2016/2014-07%20-%20Rio%202016%20-%20Qualification%20System%20-%20FINAL%20-%20Swimming%20-%20EN.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Guam at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 04:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Reviewing soon.Nova Crystallis (Talk) 04:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• You need to be consistent with the dates in the references. Some of them are "December 31, 2016" or "14 March 2015".
  • Apply that to the rest of the article too. You can't have different date formats in the lead and in the content.
    • Done, with a script Kees08 (Talk)
• "they had worked on" Worked on what?
  • Ugh, I think I made it worse... Kees08 (Talk)
• There is more info that could be pulled from the reference #3, such as what happened in the 2012 Olympics, decrease in the size of the delegation, etc.
  • Good idea, expanded. Kees08 (Talk)
• "He appealed the ruling, but after twelve hours learned it was unsuccessful. He thought the video evidence was unclear on whether he stepped on the line." You should reword it so the two sentence don't start with the same word.
  • Done Kees08 (Talk)
• "Guam received a Universality invitation" Capitalization error?
  • I think per FINA it should be capital, per Wikipedia it should not be, so removed it. Kees08 (Talk)
• A time for Shimizu should be mentioned in the prose.
  • Done Kees08 (Talk)
• "Qualifiers for the latter rounds of all swimming events were decided on a time only basis, therefore positions shown are overall results versus competitors in all heats."
  • It is just explaining the table, and how they could be placed 43rd when there are only a few people in a heat. Is there a better way to display the note? Kees08 (Talk)
• Reference 11 needs a date.
  • Done Kees08 (Talk)
• Reference 12 needs access-date.
  • Done Kees08 (Talk)
• Reference 13 needs an archive date.
  • Done Kees08 (Talk)

Should be it for now.Nova Crystallis (Talk) 04:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)