Talk:Guerlain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Style[edit]

The recent perfume reformulations by of the managers of Guerlain seems have caused many of their fans much grief. But please do note that the contributors of the article (many of which ARE fans of Guerlain's creation) should try to be less opinionated and more objective in their writing. In otherwords: More Wikipedia, less blog/flame. Sjschen 04:04, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. No-one doubts Guerlain's importance on the perfume circuit; but the style drifts in places into hype. Tearlach 10:59, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation?[edit]

It would be nice if a pronunciation guide was included in this entry. Is it "ger-LANE", "ur-LAHN", "JUR-lahn"? --68.103.154.140 05:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's GAERlahn, GAER is sorta like in GARry Sjschen 03:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A fairly good English approximation would be "Gair" (rhymes with "hair") + "lan" (rhymes with "pan").--Shirt58 (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Météorites?[edit]

The article says, in the section on products:

Since its foundation in 1828 Guerlain has created over 300 fragrances. A non-exhaustive list is as follows:

and then includes, among others, "Météorites". But I think Météorites is not a fragrance, but a face powder; cursory web search confirms this. This suggests that, at least, the introduction of the "products" section should be rewritten. I do not have enough expertise to do this. —Dominus (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Météorites is a perfume, it was created after the big success of the powder with the same name and the same fragrance.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.207.24.115 (talk) 22:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Racist Remarks[edit]

The correct English translation of "negres" in this context is "nigger", not "negro". See http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/24/guerlain-racism-legal-action , http://www.english.rfi.fr/france/20101016-guerlain-heir-racism-storm as well as http://www.theroot.com/buzz/french-perfumer-guerlain-drops-n-word-causes-scandale-0

It is important to faithfully translate the phrase, because aside from accuracy, English speaking readers will not understand the gravity and offensiveness of what he said. Sociologik (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this incident, which although made while the man was no longer on paid salary apparently cost the company a lot of good will and money, no longer mentioned in the article? (http://www.france24.com/en/20120329-jean-paul-guerlain-cosmetics-france-perfume-racism, http://www.france24.com/en/20120328-france-famed-perfumist-guerlain-faces-ruling-racist-commentsparis-court. At least at the time, there were planned legal actions against the company, not just the man: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/24/guerlain-racism-legal-action; http://www.theluxechronicles.com/the_luxe_chronicles/2010/10/luxury-silence-speaks-volumes.html).Kdammers (talk) 02:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Among the oldest in the world"[edit]

Interesting (and perhaps questionable) thing to include in the first sentence. Not exactly a contemporary of the perfume houses mentioned in the first paragraph here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creed_%28perfume%29 86.143.84.199 (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really a questionable statement. Creed was a tailoring house; despite its claims otherwise, there is no evidence thtat it released fragrances until the late 1970s at the earliest. Guerlain has been established since 1828 and is among the oldest continuously operating perfume companies in the world. Mole2 (talk) 17:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guerlain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]