This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
A blatant vanity page, by an anonymous contributor (under two ISPs) with no other intesrest in wikipedia (see History). Wetman 21:11, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I know. See my my archived talk. I've toned it down considerably, and if it doesn't turn into an ad again, it might be just marginally encyclopedic (the guy has some 600 Googlits, which might be enough for the article to survive a VfD listing). Still, if it does turn into an ad again, I'll list it on VfD myself. The original version also was a copyvio, although the poster later claimed to be the painter himself and has given permission even though he also stated that he wasn't the author of the copied text. This minor (and disputed) copyvio is now still in the page history. Lupo 07:09, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)