Talk:Guilloché

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Metalworking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I think that one of the links is nothing but a google bomb/magnet. I want to delete it but I thought I should ask first. I don't want to step on anyone's toes here. ˜˜˜˜

Major reconstruction

As you can see I’ve redone the article, should anyone have any questions please refer to my talk page!

Thank You

Bloger 04:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spirograph/spirograph; spelling

The first mention of spirograph (without cap) goes to Spirograph as does the second one with cap. They both naturally go the same page about the toy. Do you mean Lissajous curve for the first mention?

Hate to be a noodge, but you say that the word is usually spelled (unless in a specific context) without the accent aigu in English, but then the rest of the article uses it with the accent. Should that be fixed?

Best,--Shlishke (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes it should be going to a different page, but I think rather to epicycloid or hypocycloid.

And about the spelling, although Guilloche is usually spelled without the accent aigu, nevertheless the proper way is with the accent aigu, that’s why I spelled it that way.

BTW, why did you take out the part that explains why the term is used in other then metal work?

Bloger (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it was a repeat of info that is in the "In Today's Terminology" section. Right? --Shlishke (talk) 01:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were right; it was a repeat of sorts. But, I thought the older was a little clearer so I changed it a little to get it back!

Bloger (talk) 02:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To day the most rappresantative engraver is Mario Renzetti & Figlio of Milan Italy

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guilloché. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040817160137/http://users.lmi.net/~drewid/PWR_engine_turning.html to http://users.lmi.net/~drewid/PWR_engine_turning.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:34, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

The French original is pronounced /ɡi.jɔ.ʃe/ with an audible "e" at the end; however, the article currently claims it's spelled with é yet silent. Are we mixing up the spellings and pronunciations here? Jpatokal (talk) 05:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English IPA comes first, and we should mark the French pronunciation for what it is. However it was perhaps slightly muddled, so I reordered to make it clearer. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my limited experience, on British tv it is usually "gillosh" or "gwillosh" but sometimes "gillosh-ay" or "gwillosh-ay". Johnbod (talk) 12:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]