Jump to content

Talk:Guto Puw/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Biography: Seven sentences in this section start with the word He. Best to vary to eliminate this sort of repetition. Green tickY
    Music: Two sentences starting Many of his compositions ... Green tickY
    Lead: Again repetitive phrasing - the lead should fully summarise the whole article, i don't think it quite does this at present.
    Overall, I recommend a thorough copy-edit to improve the prose and make it flow better.
    I would further recommend a separate Awards section to include awards and nominations, and re-organising the Music section, perhaps sub-dividing to make it more readable.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The references could do with formatting using templates such as {{cite news}} and {{cite web}}
    ref #1 [1] is a dead link; ref #4[2]I note the source names John Metcalf but you have John Metcalfe?; ref #5[3] doesn't say that he is the the Welsh Medium Teaching Fellow for the School of Music; ref #7 [4] is just a search page; ref #8 [5] just returns an empty page; ref #15 [6] failed verification; ref #17 [7] is a dead link; ref #19 is a dead link;
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No images are used, but I recommend searching for an image - not a GA requirement however.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days for these issues to be addressed. Major contributors and projects will be informed.Jezhotwells (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, I think the issues have been fixed now, so I am happy for this artcile to reatin its GA status, thanks for your hard work.
Progress
  • Jubileeclipman (talk · contribs) has been addressing the prose, thankfully.
  • I've made a start on the deadlinks etc.
  • I can't find any free-use images of Puw, having had another look.

More to come, no doubt. BencherliteTalk 13:16, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]