Jump to content

Talk:Guus Berkhout

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion on this article's use of Climate Feedback on the reliable sources noticeboard

[edit]

There is a discussion on this article's use of the Climate Feedback fact check 'Letter signed by “500 scientists” relies on inaccurate claims about climate science' on the reliable sources noticeboard. If you are interested, please participate at WP:RSN § Factcheck from climatefeedback.org as a source at Guus Berkhout. — Newslinger talk 23:08, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That discussion is now in an archive. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World Climate Declaration

[edit]

A search for "World Climate Declaration" [1] simply jumps to this site (with a note that it is a re-direct). I don't know if the Washington Times is a credible source, but it mentions the declaration (https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/sep/2/corrupt-news-media-majoring-in-omission/), noting that two Nobel laureates [note: at least one of them is a physicist who has not published any research on climate or weather] are among the " 1,609 scientists, academics and engineers" who signed this document, which, the article says maintains that there is "'no climate emergency.'" The declaration is sort of criticized in this article: https://phys.org/news/2023-08-science-publisher-flawed-climate.html (i.e., papers by its contributors are said to have been flawed). A piece in the cowboy state daily says one of the signers does not deny climate change but says other factors are the big culprits: https://cowboystatedaily.com/2023/08/20/former-uw-professor-among-1-600-scientists-to-declare-climate-change-not-an-emergency/. A fact-check of the earlier version of the declaration is at https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/09/16/fact-check-did-1200-climate-experts-sign-declaration-denying-climate-emergency . A secondary source supporting the declaration is https://catholicvote.org/coalition-of-scientists-no-climate-emergency/ . This pay-walled secondary source apparently criticizes the declaration: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-33592-1_4 . I think there is enough material to warrant an entry for the declaration. 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:48E4:5008:3C07:91D2 (talk) 21:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article already mentions World Climate Declaration. What change are you proposing? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 21:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Presumably that it should have its own entry, not redirect to the page of some other person. I agree, it should. Starchild (talk) 10:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Phoenix7777 made this redirect on 4 October 2022. I agree it's odd, but don't know that World Climate Declaration is notable enough to have its own page. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]