Talk:Guy Walks into a Bar... (album)

On 24 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Guy Walks into a Bar... to Guy Walks into a Bar... (album). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 24 April 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

– ... and redirects both titles to the dab A Man Walks Into a Bar (also disambiguating titles with "guy" rather than "man"), which includes several other works that it's unclear why these are primary over. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment None of the pages currently listed at A Man Walks Into a Bar require parenthetical disambiguation as none of them are direct conflicts with each other, per WP:SMALLDETAILS, and as proper nouns don't conflict with the lowercase variants which should redirect to bar joke, per WP:DIFFCAPS. Thus I would oppose the moves as improper disambiguation (hatnotes needed instead), except that Guy_Walks_into_a_Bar_(Justified) and A Man Walks Into a Bar... (NCIS) are already unnecessarily disambiguated, the latter due to a recent RM, so there is a consistency argument to be made to yield a reasonable new status quo. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as unnecessary WP:OVERPRECISION. A man walks into a bar and A guy walks into a bar are both already redirects to Bar joke. These two, on the other hand, are capitalized titles of specific works that are different from each other and any other title on WP. Anyone bothering to type caps and/or ellipses almost certainly is looking for the song or album; to add those words to the title is just redundant. For the minority, any possible confusion is easily and properly handled by hatnotes. Station1 (talk) 06:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Lack of ambiguity is always most helpful to Wikipedia. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.