Talk:Gynomonoecy
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Redirect
[edit]Will this ever grow beyond a stub? Suggest redirect to Glossary of botanical terms, or Plant reproductive morphology. Mathglot (talk) 23:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hard to tell, but suspect you are right. Almost none of the terms at Plant_reproductive_morphology#Terminology are links. Dioecy is of course, but note Gynodioecy has a reasonable article. Shrug :/ --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:31, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Elidae there are a good amount of sources on this tho. It’s just I need some help.CycoMa (talk) 17:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- The comments at Talk:Andromonoecy apply here as well. Mathglot (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Ovule producing genes
[edit]Plantsurfer the source cited in that section mentioned something about ovule producing genes.CycoMa (talk) 13:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- regardless, the deleted sentence was so garbled that it was incapable of conveying accurate, meaningful information. Plantsurfer 18:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)