Talk:Gynomonoecy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redirect[edit]

Will this ever grow beyond a stub? Suggest redirect to Glossary of botanical terms, or Plant reproductive morphology. Mathglot (talk) 23:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to tell, but suspect you are right. Almost none of the terms at Plant_reproductive_morphology#Terminology are links. Dioecy is of course, but note Gynodioecy has a reasonable article. Shrug :/ --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:31, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Elidae there are a good amount of sources on this tho. It’s just I need some help.CycoMa (talk) 17:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The comments at Talk:Andromonoecy apply here as well. Mathglot (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ovule producing genes[edit]

Plantsurfer the source cited in that section mentioned something about ovule producing genes.CycoMa (talk) 13:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

regardless, the deleted sentence was so garbled that it was incapable of conveying accurate, meaningful information. Plantsurfer 18:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]