Jump to content

Talk:Héctor López

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHéctor López has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowIn the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 11, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
October 30, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
February 8, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 27, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Héctor López was the first Panamanian-born Major League Baseball player to play in the World Series with the New York Yankees?
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on October 5, 2022.
Current status: Good article

Needs work

[edit]

I worked a bit on the intro, but this needs a good deal of work. It jumps around a little chronologically. Also, all of the chatter about what position he played at what time seems trivial and distracting. IMHO.--Epeefleche 03:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The positions may be a bit too much, but it's still important. He was a near full-time infielder who converted to an outfielder to play with Mantle and Maris, and that seems really interesting and quite an unusual trivia fact, and something that should be mentioned. Maybe the text can be modified to not sound as trivial, but I think that bit should stay, nonetheless. Ksy92003(talk) 03:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'll make a chart. That'll be clearer than prose.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to clean up the language a bit, and to re-order some of the material that did not follow chrono order, but think it still needs work.--Epeefleche 16:39, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now it looks choppy. We have to put Humpty Dumpty back together again to get a GA and for the good of the project.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good luck. I think it has a way to go to get a B rating, to be honest ... needs much editing work. Cheers.--Epeefleche 18:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Auto Peer Review

[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA failed

[edit]

Great article so far! The prose is very good. I think it is well on its way to GA standard, but but needs some more work. Below is the standard GA assessment template followed by detailed comments. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Detailed comments:

Thanks! --Bloodzombie 03:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold

[edit]

I have now reviewed this article under the six Good article criteria, and have commented in detail on each criterion below:

1 Well written FAIL

1.1 Prose

Although the prose is generally good, flows well and is pleasant to read, there are a couple of issues:

  • López's name is spelt inconsistently throughout the article (sometimes with accents, sometimes without).Green tickY--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 21:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "He (along with Ismael Laguna, Roberto Duran, and Mariano Rivera) continues to be on the tip of the tongue of Panamanians as a legendary world champion who represented the country." Although this is sourced (but see 2 below), it reads as rather unencyclopaedic.
    • I concede that this is only one person, but in this context he is speaking for many. I also happen to know that other Panamanians share this opinion because my father was 1957 Athlete of the Year for the Republic of Panama. I am not sure what to do, but it is a valid statement that is lightly sourced. However, it is not random everyman on the street who we are referencing. It is a national team coach.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 22:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Perhaps rewording this would help then - I'll have a think about it & get back to you ;) EyeSereneTALK 16:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • Sorry for the delay in getting back to you! OK, how about making the sentence more specific? Something like "In 2006 he was cited by the national team coach as ranking alongside such noted Panamanian sports personalities as Ismael Laguna, Roberto Duran, and Mariano Rivera." Would this fit the bill? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EyeSerene (talkcontribs) 11:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1.2 Manual of Style

Again, this is mostly good. Just one minor point here:

2 Factual accuracy FAIL

Good use is made of sources for the most part. However...

  • The cited source (number 18) for the sentence I picked out in 1.1 above does not really seem to support that sentence.
  • There are a number of facts quoted in the Panamanian history that really should have explicit citations (almost every sentence in fact!). However, I think we could accept a few general citations as long as they cover all the statements there.

3 Coverage PASS

Taking into account the comments above, I think the coverage is adequate (after all, it's a sport bio!). The article is focused.

4 Neutrality PASS

The article's tone is suitably NPOV throughout.

5 Stability PASS

The article contains no evidence of current major alterations or recent edit-warring.

6 Images N/A

Images are not required at GA, although a suitable picture would be nice for the future development of the article.

As a result of the above concerns I have placed the article on hold. This gives editors up to a week to address the issues raised (although in some circumstances the hold period can be briefly extended). To help with tracking, editors may like to strike through each comment as it is dealt with, or use the template {{done}} after each comment.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or are ready for a re-review. In any case I'll check back here in seven days (around 8th Feb). All the best, EyeSereneTALK 18:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA pass

[edit]

Thank you for the work you have put in to bring this article up to GA standards. I am happy to pass it, and have updated the various templates to reflect this review. Congratulations! EyeSereneTALK 10:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Info

[edit]

When I get a chance I will read pages 201-207 of this. If someone else is interested and has time before me go right ahead.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed removal of redundant publisher information

[edit]

A number of citations in this article unnecessarily include the publisher for periodicals and websites that have their own Wikipedia article. This information has no value to anyone wanting to check or track down references. For example, publisher=Washington Post Company for references to The Washington Post, or publisher=MLB Advanced Media for references to Baseball-Reference.com, only make the article longer - significantly longer when repeated many times - without adding anything useful. Therefore I plan to upgrade the article's citations to remove all such redundant publisher info, bringing them into line with the recommended use of the cite template (see Template:Citation#Publisher). Please raise any questions here or on my talk page. Colonies Chris (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Héctor López. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Héctor López. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Post playing career section

[edit]

Is almost entirely wrong.

1- Lopez didn't retire from pro ball in 1966. That was just the year he last played in the majors. Note- The article makes mention of his playing minor league ball in 67.

2- Even though it is referenced twice, Lopez can't have been playing in Yankee old timer's games starting in 1967. That's a claim from Lopez but in 1967 he was playing 130 plus games for the Hawaii Islanders. He was playing minor league ball in 68 too.

The part about when he retired should be removed. I'd just say he played in Old Timers games for approximately 50 years....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]