Talk:HB9XBG Antenna

Hi @John B123:, You added the "refimprove" remarks to the HB9XBG Antenna article. I think that we have referenced sufficently with reference number (2) in the article. Not only do we reference the Antenna but we additionally give a direct access to the full and original article in the Journal. See here. Can you please remove the "refimprove" remarks? I do not think that we need more than one reference, which by the way is the most straight reference possible! Kind regards, --Hp.Baumeler (talk) 14:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Hp.Baumeler, it's not the number of references that is the problem. Per WP:VERIFY, All content must be verifiable ... and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. The second half of the Principle of the antenna section and the Advantages of the HB9XBG antenna section are unreferenced. The sources already given way well verify the content, but this needs to be made clear on the page. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi @John B123: @Olga Ernst:. All aspects mentionned are mentionned and taught in the article published in HBradio-journal. As you explained I now added this references (reference number (2) in the artricle) to the paragraphes. Now all paragraphes are referenced and I hope you can delete the refimprove-note. Thank you very much. Regards, --Hp.Baumeler (talk) 05:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Hp.Baumeler, that looks fine now, thanks. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 06:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi @John B123: @Olga Ernst:. Thank you JohnB123! Regards, Hp. --Hp.Baumeler (talk) 11:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)