Talk:HD 203473

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was redirected by 400Weir. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging HD 203473 b into HD 203473. This is another case where a planet candidate turned out to be a star; as with other such cases there's really no need to have two separate articles. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Independent notability of the exoplanet is a bit sketchy, but as a non-planet it would be non-existent. I didn't see that in a very brief look at the literature. though. Is there some very recent paper that I didn't spot? Lithopsian (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see, Feng et al (2022). Lithopsian (talk) 13:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, it's a star?! Let me check it out! Speed doesn't always mean quality. 400Weir (talk) 18:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I forgot to ask for a link. Speed doesn't always mean quality. 400Weir (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'ma do it right now. Speed doesn't always mean quality. 400Weir (talk) 18:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.