Talk:HMS Boadicea (H65)
Appearance
HMS Boadicea (H65) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 4, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Boadicea (H65) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Boadicea (H65)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Khanate General (talk · contribs) 21:40, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Will review in the next few days.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 21:40, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
General[edit]
- No disambiguation links.
- No neutrality issues.
- No missing in-line citations.
- No original research.
- Article is stable.
- I've yet to detect any major spelling or grammatical errors.
- Copyright tags for the picture look fine.
Description[edit]
- Admiralty 3-drum boiler is a double redirect.
Construction and service[edit]
- Link to Admiralty?
- Link to English Channel and Southampton Water?
- "when she sailed for Le Havre, France on 9 June to assist in the evacuation of British troops there" Evacuate from what? The German occupation?
- Link to Gibraltar?
- "220 survivors from MV Incomati" What did they survive? Was the ship torpedoed?
- Link to Operation Overlord?
- Great article. There are no major problems.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 02:29, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- This article passes as a GA. It's an excellent article.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 14:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Great article. There are no major problems.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 02:29, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Ping--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Shipwreck articles
- Low-importance Shipwreck articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class SCUBA articles
- Low-importance SCUBA articles
- WikiProject SCUBA articles