Talk:HMS Caradoc (D60)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 09:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Will review over the weekend. Miyagawa (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, let's finally get to this. At least then it'll be before the following weekend!
- Image licence is good.
- No dab links.
- External links are all fine.
- Link C-class cruiser when it appears in the first sentence of Design and description (as it'll be the first appearance in the article body itself).
- Likewise, Royal Navy in the first sentence of Construction and career, and Grand Fleet in the same paragraph and Second Battle of Heligoland Bight in the following paragraph.
- Link Bolshevik in the third paragraph of that section where it appears for the first time.
- Ummm, linked in the lede.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- You can remove the link to Estonia.
- I got chastised in a recent review for not linking (obscure) countries, and given the geographic illiteracy so common nowadays, I've taken that reviewer's comment to heart.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Link Chanak Crisis where it appears in the article body (it only appears once there and once in the lead).
- Second World War: [Pound sterling|£]two million - the wikilink is broken.
- New York City 28 October 1941–26 February 1942 - stick "between" inbetween City and 28.
- South Africa, 21 June–3 July - throw a between in there too.
- Link East Indies Fleet towards the end - either piped to Eastern Fleet, or skip that and then just link Eastern Fleet when you specifically mention it.
- References are all good, and I like the research template.
- @Sturmvogel 66: That's everything - it's just all fiddling with links mostly. Miyagawa (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing this, Miyagawa. I generally only link on first use, regardless of location in an article of this length.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- No worries - I just checked WP:REPEATLINK and it isn't particularly clear about whether there should be multiple links or not. It isn't helpful when a guideline throws a "general" in there and then contradicts itself in the following sentence! So happy to leave things as they are. Passing. Miyagawa (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing this, Miyagawa. I generally only link on first use, regardless of location in an article of this length.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)