Talk:HMS Defender (1911)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Defender (1911) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Image copyright problem with Image:HMS Defender Crest.JPG[edit]

The image Image:HMS Defender Crest.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem resolved[edit]

A non-free use rationale has been included on the image page for this article; all is now appropriate for the use of this image. Shem (talk) 13:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kipling text[edit]

There is now a lot of Kipling's book and it makes fascinating reading. But for one thing it overwhelms the article with unencyclopaedic (in the sheer level of detail) information related to a particular event, and for another I'm uneasy about the copyright status. It's certainly far more than we can get away with under fair use if it is copyrighted, and even if it isn't, it still doesn't fit with WP:QUOTE. I'd strongly suggest moving the vast majority of the current material over to Wikisource if the copyright is clear, but even and especially if not, cutting it right back to a few carefully selected sentences. Benea (talk) 21:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no copyright expert, but Kipling died in 1936, which means that the text ceased to be copyrighted in 2006 - see Wikipedia:Copyright#UK_Copyright. Please enlighten me if I'm getting this wrong.

As for unencyclopedic, however, I agree entirely. When I added the the Kipling stuff in December 2007 it was the only decent source I had, but there is far more now. It needs a gentle but thorough cropping. I'll put it on my to-do-list. Shem (talk) 17:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only area of copyright I have working experience in is of images, but I'd strongly suspect texts follow the same principles. Might be worth checking out before a transwiki, but I agree that it seems public domain now. No rush though, and I'll have a scout through my books to see if there's anything else that we can expand the ship's career with. Best of luck! Benea (talk) 19:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]