Talk:HMS Hercules (1910)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 06:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
This article is in pretty good shape.
- The displacement in the text and infobox doesn't match.
- probably worth specifying that the secondary guns were in single mounts
- After introducing BS as an abbreviation, suggest referring to 1st BS.
- suggest linking mobilisation
- Excellent idea!
- link Home Fleet at first mention
- Linked in the lede
- link dreadnought at 16 dreadnoughts
- Isn't this covered in the link for dreadnought battleships in the lede? Or is this just different enough?
- the sentence beginning During this foray appears to be out of sequence
- Moved earlier in the para, but I kinda think that it breaks the flow up a bit, what do you think?
- I think it flows ok.
- Moved earlier in the para, but I kinda think that it breaks the flow up a bit, what do you think?
- Agincourt should probably be linked
- Good catch.
- she was sold
- images are all appropriately licensed and captioned.
That's me done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- I appreciate you looking this over. Let me know what you think of my changes.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- No prob. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by appropriately license images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
HE shell use at Jutland ?[edit]
"One of her high-explosive (HE) shells penetrated through the upper superstructure and caused minor splinter damage. The second HE shell burst on hitting the upper hull armour,.." ? She would have been firing armour-piercing, not HE at naval targets ? Rcbutcher (talk) 06:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)