Talk:HMS Hibernia (1905)

HMS Hibernia (1905) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

HMS Hibernia (1905) is part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 30, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed
August 23, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Hibernia (1905)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 08:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zawed: - I wonder if you've lost track of this one? Parsecboy (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, time got away on me a little bit. It is a long weekend here in NZ, and I will aiming to review this before it ends. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 07:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, no rush, I've been out of town over the weekend too! Parsecboy (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, my review comments as follows:

Lead

No issues identified

Design

The m conversion for the beam dimension recited in text appears to have been rounded up compared to infobox, but no other measurements treated this way?
- Fixed, good catch

Service history

"...she was rammed by the barque Loch Trool just after Loch Trool had collided ...": could this sentence be rephrased to avoid the close repetition of Loch Trool?
- Done
"...were assigned to form the 3rd Battle Squadron, assigned to the First Fleet, Home Fleet.": as above, could this be rephrased to avoid the close repetition of assigned?
- Done
"was Augustus Agar, later V.C. and to become famous for exploits against the Bolsheviks and as captain of the heavy cruiser Dorsetshire in World War II." My suggested change in italics, feels like something missing otherwise.
- Good idea
"she was sold for scrapping to": the link for scrapping is actually later in this paragraph, it should be moved to this occurence, its first mention.
- Done, and reworded slightly to reduce the repetition of "scrapping"

Notes/references

Note 4 needs to be put into sfn format for consistency with other citations
- Whoops, good catch

Other stuff

External links checks out OK
No dab links
No dupe links
Images look appropriately tagged

@Parsecboy: Excellent work as always, only a few minor points requiring attention. I made a couple of what I thought were straightforward edits as well. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, your edits look good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 13:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with your changes and passing this as GA as I believe it meets the criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]