Talk:HMS Lord Clyde

HMS Lord Clyde has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 28, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Lord Clyde (1864)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 10:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No duplicate links (no action required)
Checklinks reports all clear (no action required)
There is a link to a disambiguation page: Condenser - please pipe the link to an appropriate topic
Image is appropriately licensed and its caption appears to be in order (no action required)
In She was laid down on 29 September 1863 at launched on 13 October 1864., shouldn't there be "and" instead of "at"?
Even though "VC" is explained by the wikilink, I'm wondering if it would be better to spell out "Victoria Cross" instead.
Referencing is fine (no action required)

Nice article with exceptionally little to mend before it is passed. Great work.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]