Jump to content

Talk:HMS Tiger Bay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TMI

[edit]

TMI from mother article (Cardiff) for inclusion here at a later date:

the boat was renamed {{HMS|Tiger Bay}},<ref name="Deployment Diary"/> in honour of the [[Tiger Bay]] dock area in Cardiff.<ref name="isbn0-85045-492-1">{{cite book |last=English|first=Adrian J. |title=Battle for the Falklands (2) : Naval Forces (Men-At-Arms Series, 134) |url =http://books.google.com/books?id=Z7oyS1HviOcC&pg=PA25&lpg=PA25&dq=%22hms+tiger+bay%22&source=web&ots=70XoFPxSRS&sig=XjRTJKBIRC5NR0rqQ39Kdg1hiJM#PPA25,M1 |publisher=Osprey Publishing |location=Reading |pages=25|isbn=0-85045-492-1 |accessdate=2008-03-11 |year=1982}}</ref> The boat, originally ''Islas Malvinas GC82'', had been damaged by gunfire from {{HMS|Alacrity|F174|6}}'s Lynx on 1 May, near [[Kidney Island]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hmsalacrity.co.uk/may.html |title=Alacrity in action |publisher=www.hmsalacrity.co.uk |accessdate=2008-02-24}}</ref>

Ryan4314 (talk) 17:32, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate article name?

[edit]

This ship spent most of its career under Argentine flag, including participating in war actions; hence the article should be under the Argentine name. Same case as the Belgrano cruiser. Unless there is sound reason not to, will rename article to new name based on that premise. Regards,DPdH (talk) 05:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article name is perfectly appropriate, per the example you gave, ARA General Belgrano (C-4) has its own article, USS Phoenix (CL-46) also has its own article. If you want to create a separate article on its Argentine service, go right ahead and do so. WCMemail 13:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Tiger Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]