Talk:Haakon Lie

Haakon Lie has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 26, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 19, 2007.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that at the age of 102, former Labour party secretary Haakon Lie (pictured) is still an active participant in Norwegian public life?

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Better picture?*

The charcoal picture is nice, but since he's alive, isn't there some better picture available? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.234.217.82 (talk) 04:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure there is, the problem is finding one that is not copyrighted. The drawing is made by an editor, and serves the purpose nicely, I think. Lampman (talk) 08:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Wow, I've been watching this page and the work you've done on it is impressive. A few quick concerns before I can pass it as a Good Article:

"As the party split between communists and social democrats in the early 1920s, Lie ended up on the latter wing. The bitter strife between the two factions did much to influence his life-long anti-communist stance." (Early years) This sentence is confusing out of context. What party are you talking about? You're definitely talking about something that hasn't been introduced yet here.
"He then started working as secretary for the party." (Early years) Again, what party are we talking about here?
"His experience with authoritarian states — fascist or communist — helped convince him that the free world had to stand united against the threats of dictatorship." (Early years) That's not really a very neutral sentence, and could be reworded to conform to NPOV standards
All one-two sentence paragraphs must either be expanded or merged with surrounding paragraphs, as they cannot stand alone. (There's only one; at the end of (World War II))
"Yet Lie was stronger in his support of the United States, and more fierce in his anti-communism, than most in his party. In 1961 a splinter part emerged, known as Sosialistisk Folkeparti." (Reconstruction) requires a citation
The first reference and the first external link are the same. The third reference and the second external link are the same. The seventh reference and the third external link are the same. In all these cases, it's redundant to have the external link version and they should be removed.

To allow for these changes to be made, I am placing the article on hold for a period of seven days, after which it may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work thus far. Cheers, CP 20:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Lampman (talk) 11:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. I will now be passing the article as a Good Article. An expansion of the lead would be my only other suggestion at this time, but as it stands it's good enough for the status. Congratulations, and thank you for your hard work! Cheers, CP 19:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Haakon Lie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071224083358/http://www.dagsavisen.no:80/kultur/article298322.ece to http://www.dagsavisen.no/kultur/article298322.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Haakon Lie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]