Jump to content

Talk:Hadia Tajik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Non Caucasian ethnic backround

[edit]

In the article it is claimed that Hadia is the second minister with non Caucasian backround: "She is historically the second minister with non-caucasian ethnic background after Manuela Ramin-Osmundsen, who resigned as Minister of Children, Equality and Social Inclusion in 2008.[12]". But isn´t Sout Asian Caucasians, at least that is what is claimed in wikipedia. Modin (talk) 20:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition for deletion of this article

[edit]

I found this article regarding miss Hadia Tajik should be deleted as she is not notable for inclusion. Not so. There is an article in the Norwegian bokmål/riksmål wikipedia, she is notable in Norway and as such she is also notable in the english version of Wikipedia. I am therefore removing the deletion template. Ulflarsen (talk) 08:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have added one such reference from the webpages of the Norwegian government, she has actually served three different ministers of the Stoltenberg II government. Ulflarsen (talk) 17:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She was elected to the Norwegian Parliament on September 14, 2009. --Pylambert (talk) 14:45, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information Pylambert; I've updated the article accordingly. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 14:47, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani-Norwegian?

[edit]

The article states that she is Pakistani-Norwegian, however in the similar article in Norwegian she is said to be Norwegian-Pakistani. I would say that both are dubious, she is born in Norway and have lived there most of her life, except from studies in the UK, at most I would suggest that she should be described as Norwegian with a Pakistani background. Ulflarsen (talk) 19:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hadia Tajik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"She also praised Dagbladet’s coverage of the same case, citing that they were being critical" (moved to discussion)

[edit]

The quote has been moved to discussion. 89.8.178.1 (talk) 10:26, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"reasoning that they were trying to find reasons to her decisions just like in other similar cases" (needs removal)

[edit]

Please consider removing that text from the article. 89.8.178.1 (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to discussion - wikipedia is an encyclopedia (not other type of media)

[edit]
  • "Tajik expressed support for reform of the AFP pension scheme, after a case of an elderly woman having lost her AFP pension by a three week margin. Tajik further stated that the case illustrated the challenges with the current shape of the AFP scheme. She commented: “At the same time, I would like to emphasize that AFP is the parties' system. LO and NHO have studied a sketch for an alternative design of the AFP scheme. It tries to meet some of the challenges with today's AFP“.[1]". 89.8.190.102 (talk) 20:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]
  1. ^ "Elsa mistet AFP-pensjonen: – Saken illustrerer en av utfordringene med dagens ordning, sier Hadia Tajik" (in Norwegian). Dagsavisen. 27 February 2022. Retrieved 1 March 2022.