Talk:Haemaphysalis concinna

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veterinary medicine Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Haemaphysalis concinna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100324114224/http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a7505973/de/zecken/system.html to http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a7505973/de/zecken/system.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

error

Moved from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

En la página https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haemaphysalis_concinna se muestra una imágen equivocada pues no es una Haemaphysalis concina sino una garrapata del genero Dermacentor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.154.210.29 (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The user is saying that the image in the article is of a tick in the genus Dermacentor and not Haemaphysalis concina, that a wrong image is shown in the article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I don’t have the expertise to verify this but Google Lens seem to suggest the user is correct. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gumruch it looks like you added the image in question. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I took the picture during the practical course of parasitology at the university, however there could be a mistake in labeling the specimens we observed. Unfortunetally I am not a specialist so I can not tell with certanty if it is right or wrong. Thank you 217.30.78.250 (talk) 17:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]