Talk:Hampus Hellekant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Slander[edit]

The article was serious slander. Statements about crimes never comitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.231.19 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slander? What would you claim to be not true? Everything has been confirmed by many independent sources apart from the Swedish courts themselves. --Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New name[edit]

What is the reason for including his new name in the Wikipedia article? Ulner (talk) 23:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get any answer to my question, and have hence deleted his new name from the article. Ulner 19:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any reason to not include his new name? Jobjörn (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can find no reason not to publish his new name. It shall remain.--Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slander[edit]

Wikipedia is not for slander. Since nobody objected I edited the article. For full discussion se swedish wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.10.143.118 (talk) 13:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Wikipedia shouldn't be used for slander. This however is as far away from slander as can be. --Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slander[edit]

Article contains statements about convictions that are not true. It also contains emotional descriptions that does not belong in a encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.10.143.118 (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you keep repeating it doesn't make it so. It's slanderous that you insist on this being slanderous.--Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To Hampus Hellekant[edit]

I have requested deletion of the article twice [1][2]; to no avail, even though I asked the admin to reconsider and explained the situation. I have also requested Wikipedia:Oversight to delete my revisions. Plrk (talk) 11:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The votes are in and they are not in your favor, the facts are facts and can not be removed just because you for dim reasons wish it so.--Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]