Talk:Hanatarō Yamada

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Regarding 'the Unohana stuff,' Hanatarō states during the episode-ending omake in episode 70 that Unohana has given him permission to see the living world. The dialogue is Unohana-taichou ni gensei mite ki nasai.

Also, as for Hanatarō being imprisoned and broken out by Rikichi, rather than just being called by him, the dialogue in chapter 149 of the manga clearly states that Hanatarō was imprisoned for trying to help Rukia, and that when 11th division destroyed the medical facility, Rikichi used that opportunity to get him out of his cell.

Additionally, about his stamina-restoring energy pill, information about its being a dud given him as a prank is found in the omake sketch for chapter 102 of the manga. It is, of course, possible that in the anime, his pill is meant to work.

I'm also curious about where the information about Hisagomaru's abilities comes from.

--Playing Mantis 18:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing the sources. Please understand that dozens of users, almost all of them anonymous (under an IP address only), add information to the Bleach articles that is simply fan speculation. Therefore, in order to stall the flow of baseless info from the source, I (or other Bleach frequenters) revert all such edits. Registering an account is a sure way to be taken more seriously, and it's good that you registered one. However, a sure-fire way to not get your edits reverted (granted of course that they have a basis) is to provide sources within the article, which I will do now. You can use this example to see how it's done. -- Y Ynhockey ^(Talk) Y 20:54, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The information about Hisagomaru comes from the Bleach databook according to a certain editor. As an assumption of good faith (which is Wikipedia policy), I believed him, but if you think the information is false, feel free to remove it for the time being. When I get a chance to look at the databook, I'll see if it's true. -- Y Ynhockey ^(Talk) Y 20:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also believe a lot of it came from the in-between chapter sketches of the tankoban releases when Kon possesses Hanatarou for a while? k_shi translated some information on that, but I'll have to double check - Kurotsuchi mayuri 08:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That has recently appeared in Shinigami Zukan (Kon possessing Hanatarō was seen after episode 119, and an attempt to use Hisagomaru after 120). However, if the translation (I believe it was by Dattlebayo) is correct, then it heals the wounds of everyone it touches whether it was caused in this fight or not. If you look at the wound being healed, it is brown and it does not look like Kon broke the skin. My guess is it's either a scar or a wound that had clotted over enough for him to be allowed to fight.

Sam 11:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought, given the situation, the creators of Bleach were just making fun at Kon's totally horrible skills. I also think that you are correct in saying the time of fight does not matter to Hisagomaru... IceUnshattered (talk) 22:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Akeiro Hisagomaru[edit]

Should it be mentioned that the healing restriction is/was not lifted in the anime? Bushido Brown 23:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hn, that's a good question, but I don't think it is particularly important. IceUnshattered (talk) 22:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]