Talk:Hannah Claus

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 13 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gtaguines. Peer reviewers: Moogandang.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

The article is very well organized and has all the components that it needs. The introduction is a short overview of the artist’s background and what type of artwork she does. It is a small peak into what the article entails. Something you could add to grab attention, is other people praising her artwork like quotes from them. Your Bibliography is very short and concise, which makes the article easier to read. My only suggestion would be to maybe include some information about her exhibitions, because otherwise it just looks like a large list with not much significance (such as what the exhibition was and what it contained). Your article has a very clear structure and everything is very neutral. It is great that you have a lot of references, it shows that your article is very accurate and filled with information. The sources seem reliable as well, there are some websites as well as books. Some sections are a bit longer than others, but this is also something that I struggled with, because there was not much information on the education of my artist besides what degree he had. Overall, your article is very well written, concise, well organized and presents a neutral tone throughout the whole article.

Moogandang (talk) 23:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC) Megan Dang[reply]