Talk:Hansa-Brandenburg W.29

Hansa-Brandenburg W.29 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 16, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

CE[edit]

Auto-edded, dupe wl check, a few typos repaired, all suggestive. Keith-264 (talk) 11:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hansa-Brandenburg W.29/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 03:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 03:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments as follows:

Background and description

The fuselage retained its depth after of the rear cockpit...: should that be "aft of the rear..."

Operational history

link Zeebrugge
destroy naval mines by gunfire after the war that included 25 unarmed W.29s.: if they were unarmed how could they destroy the mines by gunfire?
The Hungarian Soviet Republic ordered production of the W.29 at UFAG to restart.: something missing here, maybe "restart [or rebuild] its air force?"
Even though it is briefly touched upon in the operators section, it seems like the World War 1 section needs a mention of when the production examples first started reaching service with the Naval Air Service.
- Deliveries began in April, I don't know when they began to be delivered to combat units--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Which Owers ref is cite 11?
Cite 18 doesn't need the year as a disambig, there is only one Mikesh & Abe listed in the bibliography

The Năstase ref appears to be a book, shouldn't it be listed in the bibliography?
- It's a magazine article to which I cannot get access.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff

Dupe link: cockpit
Image tags OK

That's all for now. Zawed (talk) 10:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review; see if my changes are satisfactory--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changes look fine, so passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]