Talk:Hardcore Justice (2010)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hardcore Justice (2010) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Hardcore Justice (2010) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opening heading[edit]

Ok so why is it that every wrestling relates article has that atulpid storyline text? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.205.208.214 (talk) 02:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

Considering they're taglining it The Last Stand, shouldn't this just be TNA Hardcore Justice? Tony2Times (talk) 11:04, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Storyline Section[edit]

It is painfully annoying that someone has apparently decided that every single pro wrestling entry is required to have the exact same "storyline" section. Could someone please explain the reasoning behind that? Shouldn't that be reserved for the entry defining what pro wrestling is? I know of no other subject where users feel compelled to include a section defining the subject in every single entry pertaining to that subject. Until I hear an explanation about why someone feels the need to include this section, I will continue to remove it from every pro wrestling entry that I visit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.111.91.184 (talk) 02:47, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can be blocked for that, that would be considered vandalism. An agreement was held to include that in PPV articles, due to the policies of WP:IN-U, WP:Jargon, etc.--WillC 06:10, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Surely then, every article about a movie, tv programme or theatre play should have the same storyline paragraph. Eugenespeed (talk) 12:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Matches[edit]

The PPV is in 3 days and there are no matches listed isnt this a little bit of a problem? --Kevmicester2000 (talk) 00:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just thinking that. No matches have been announced even on Impact. They just want to surprise us or something? I don't understand what's going on.

The matches are planned but is just not announced Totalaero (talk) 21:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hardcore Justice (2010). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]