Talk:Hardy Boyz/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The article is reasonably well-written, contains adequate reference citations from multiple sources, and mostly conforms to the manual of style. The prose and organization is in good shape, although it would be good if editors could try and weave the history section into better subsections -- the use of the different level (2nd & 3rd level subsection headers) can be somewhat confusing at times. But overall, the article is informative and meets the GA criteria. Good work! Dr. Cash (talk) 16:15, 15 December 2008 (UTC)