Talk:Harley Quinn in other media

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2019. The result of the discussion was merge.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Requested move 9 December 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moot per the result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harley Quinn in other media to merge the content of this article into Harley Quinn. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 16:32, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harley Quinn in other media → Harley Quinn in media other than comics – The current title leaves open what the other media are other than, at least if the reader doesn't know that this is about a comic book character. (This request is moot if the article does not survive AfD.) Sandstein 17:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm leaning to agree with you here, but this probably should be larger discussion as it (potentially) involves a large amount of articles and I'd rather see a WP:CONSISTENT scheme used. --Gonnym (talk) 21:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:CONCISE. People know what "in other media" means – they don't need to be spoonfed. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:47, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.