Talk:Harold Furth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of last name[edit]

During entire professional career, Furth went by "Furth" instead of "Fürth", I'll fix the article to reflect this noting that his name at birth was "Harald Fürth". cffk (talk) 16:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 July 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 17:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Harold FürthHarold FurthWP:UCRN cffk (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Sam Sailor 22:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''',then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Support I'm the editor requesting this change. During Furth's entire professional career (the reason he was a Wikipedia page in the first place), he went by "Harold Furth" or "Harold P. Furth". All the articles by him and about him (including his obituaries) used the same appellation. His grave stone says "Harold P. Furth". Following WP:UCRN, "Harold Furth" should be the name of this page with "Harold Fürth" as a redirect. This is the reverse of the current situation. cffk (talk) 22:55, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nom's don't usually vote. But I see that you tried to make this move as an uncontroversial technical move and someone contested it. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.