Jump to content

Talk:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (PC video game)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Cat's Tuxedo (talk · contribs) 18:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 21:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Initial comments[edit]

  • There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 13.8% in similarity.
  • There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
  • The article is stable. You've created the article 2 days ago and so far you're the only contributor.
  • No previous GA reviews.

General comments[edit]

  • Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
    • No issues were found in the lede.
    • The rest of the article looks good. I did not find any grammar errors.
  • Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
    • Add alt texts to the two images that are in the article.
    • I feel like the lede could be slightly expanded with content from the "Development and release" section. The article meets the rest of the MOS:LEDE guideline.
    • The article complies with the MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:WTW, and MOS:WAF guidelines. There are no embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:EMBED.
  • Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
    • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
    • No referencing issues.
    • Listed references are reliable, most are new websites. I recommend archiving the rest of the unarchived references.
    • Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21, 23, 26–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
      • Westlake Interactive developing the macOS version is unsourced.
    • Copyvio already checked.
  • Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
    • The article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
    • The Reception is well done.
    • The article stays on the topic.
  • Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
    • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
  • Checking whether the article is stable.
    • As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
  • Checking images.
    • Looks good. Images are uploaded under a non-free licence.

Final comments[edit]

@Cat's Tuxedo: There are minor issues to fix. Once they get addressed, I'll promote the article to GA. I'll put the article on hold for a week. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vacant0: Taken care of. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Potter_and_the_Philosopher%27s_Stone_(PC_video_game)/GA1&oldid=1232143303"