Talk:Hawkhurst

Kent Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Citation Needed

This is my first proper foray into Wiki editing so thought I should bring my quite minor point here. The sentence "By 1745 it is estimated[citation needed] that 20,000 people were smuggling along the Kent and Sussex coast line." appears to be based on information from Geoffrey Morley's 'The Smuggling War' but a review of this book in Policing and War in Europe (ed. by Louis Knafla) points out several errors made by Morley including the specific 'A witness before the 1745 Committee of Enquiry reckoned there were 20,000 smugglers in Britain, not just on the Sussex coast'. This being the case would it be best to change the sentence to something like:

'A witness before a 1745 Committee of Enquiry estimated there were 20,000 smugglers operating in Britain.'

This I think addresses the fact that not only was it throughout Britain but mentions the fact that it was a primary source that gave us this estimate and so is not 100% reliable.

Like I said this my first edit so I'll wait for comments but if I don't receive any I'll go ahead and change it. Thanks Riled Ignatius (talk) 15:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hawkhurst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081220042638/http://www.heyerlist.org/tua/smuggling.html to http://www.heyerlist.org/tua/smuggling.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hawkhurst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

William the Conqueror

The use of this name is inappropriate, The Kingdom of Kent was never conquered by the Nirmans, hence the county's motto "Invicta" (unconquered). The correct appellation is either William the Norman or William the Bastard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.218.183 (talk) 15:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]