Talk:Hawkwind (album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hawkwind (album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

What the Heck?

Who got away with writing this article? Jthm guitarist (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your point being?? Seriously, having looked at it a few weeks back, I very nearly deleted the whole "band formation" part myself. Not needed at all IMHO - is this your point, if so that makes two of us - anyone disagree?--C Hawke (talk) 06:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, that was my point. It's not a very big deal, but I just found it funny. This should probably be deleted, or rewritten and moved to the band's page. Jthm guitarist (talk) 22:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel it needs editing, then be bold and edit it - do something about it rather than simply complaining. The only thing I would say as far as personnel for this album is concerned, there ought to be an explanation as to why there are two different lead guitarists on it. — Drwhawkfan (talk) 13:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

back from hols and being bold - I'll remove full "formation" section for now, as to their being two lead guitarists, well, on my two copies (LP and CD) I only have one - so I'm not sure it is relevant - I may add a quick bit in the recording part--C Hawke (talk) 15:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hawkwind (album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start:

Y A reasonably complete infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
Y A track listing
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C:

Y All the start class criteria
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B:

Y All the C class criteria
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
? No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
? No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS

Upgraded from stub to C-class — Drwhawkfan (talk) 16:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 17:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hawkwind (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66kUeAtrY?url=http://www.starfarer.net/gallerym/tylrmade.jpg to http://www.starfarer.net/gallerym/tylrmade.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]