Talk:Hay Bridge, New South Wales

Australia: New South Wales / Riverina Low‑importance

	Australia portal Hay Bridge, New South Wales is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Riverina (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work!. Hughesdarren (talk) 02:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TrimmerinWiki and Hughesdarren: Hi there. Thanks for kicking off this article. Please note the significant changes made that include adding the current bridge, adding inboxes, tightening up some phrasing and references, and adding categories, see also, and a nav box. Cheers Rangasyd (talk) 13:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rangasyd and Hughesdarren: I started this article when I found nothing about this very interesting (old) bridge. I should have thought of some of the changes made myself, based on some of the other Wikipedia articles on bridges. As my interest is mainly 'historical', I probably would have had trouble with the 'new bridge' additions, myself. However, what a great team effort, and all in less than 24-hours! Thanks for the review, feedback and adding the material about the new bridge, etc.. The overall outcome is fantastic.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]