Jump to content

Talk:Heilpraktiker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Better before?

[edit]

Is the article as it currently stands an improvement over the stub that existed yesterday. I realise that it is a translation from Deutch, but it is so badly structured and referenced that the stub was better. -Roxy, the dog. Esq. wooF 16:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have twice returned this article to the stub that was in place before the German article "translation" was substituted for the stub. I make no comment about the quality of the translation work, but the resultant article does not meet tha standards of an enwiki article as the sourcing is very poor.
Please do not put that awful article back. Thanks. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 18:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't looked into this, just translated a bit of history, because the idea promoted in what I saw yesterday. that the whole profession and even the name is a Nazi invention, is plain wrong. More to come, and sources, but need a break. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]