Talk:Helen Newlove, Baroness Newlove

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was No Consensus. Per WP:Merging, this discussion should have been closed, and the merge performed, back in September 2011. However, it was not, and since then Lowellian has presented a valid argument against the merge which has not been countered, or even answered. NukeofEarl (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that the article Murder of Garry Newlove be merged into Helen Newlove, Baroness Newlove, as per WP:BIO1E, WP:NEVENTS, and WP:NOTNEWS. Previous to the murder of her husband Garry Newlove, Helen Newlove was not notable, and her notability started with the murder of her husband. As such, this is a key part of her notability, and her eventual styling as a peer. The murder of her husband, however, is only notable as an event as a result of her actions, campaigning, and a feature of her rise in notability. It is not a sufficiently notable event in itself, as it was similar to many such murders that happen almost daily around the world. What made this murder notable is directly linked to the events that happened afterwards, namely the high profile it acquired not in a small part due to the efforts of Helen Newlove. In this sense, the murder is only notable as to the role it played in the rise of Helen Newlove to notability - so it doesn't warrant an independent article, but rather its own section in her BLP.

A historical view, rather than a news-oriented view, with writing an encyclopedic article in mind, supports the view that the encyclopedic subject should be Helen Newlove, and that the events that propelled her to notability are subjected to her BLP, not separate but integral to this notability.--Cerejota (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Late coming in, but I support this. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 15:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Baroness Newlove has been appointed as the "Victims' Commissioner" which gives her a public office, and therefore entitles her to an article on Wikipedia, so this should be the main article. Paul MacDermott (talk) 14:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Media coverage of the Garry Newlove case was heavy enough that it merited its own article. That Helen Newlove later gained enough notability to have her own article does not invalidate the previous notability of the Garry Newlove case. —Lowellian (reply) 03:08, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Helen Newlove, Baroness Newlove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]